Indicative prices
GOLDUS$ 2,312.40+2.4%
PGMsUS$ 1,178.60+1.1%
MANGANESEUS$ 4.82/dmtu+3.7%
CHROME OREUS$ 312/t+0.8%
COPPERUS$ 9,460/t+1.9%
COBALTUS$ 28,420/t-0.6%
GOLDUS$ 2,312.40+2.4%
PGMsUS$ 1,178.60+1.1%
MANGANESEUS$ 4.82/dmtu+3.7%
CHROME OREUS$ 312/t+0.8%
COPPERUS$ 9,460/t+1.9%
COBALTUS$ 28,420/t-0.6%
Policy & Strategy-10 January 2025-8 min read

Why beneficiation policy fails when it treats every mineral the same

South Africa's beneficiation mandate applies a uniform logic to commodities with fundamentally different metallurgy, market structures, capital requirements and competitive positions.

VM
Victor MkhaliphiMetallurgical Engineer
About this analysis

Author & research basis

Victor Mkhaliphi is a metallurgical engineer and minerals-sector analyst with experience spanning pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy, mineral beneficiation economics and African industrial strategy.

Sources: Derived from DMRE policy archives, published metallurgical flowsheets, and McKallip Mineral Research internal models.

Last updated: 10 January 2025

Why beneficiation policy fails when it treats every mineral the same

South Africa's beneficiation strategy has often treated downstream processing as a general principle to be applied across the mining sector.

Free with an account

Keep reading — it takes ten seconds to unlock.

McKallip publishes its weekly mining-to-manufacturing analysis free of charge. Create an account to read “Why beneficiation policy fails when it treats every mineral the same” and the rest of the library.

  • Every weekly analysis, free, with no card needed
  • Follow commodities and get alerts on new research
  • Save reports and scenarios to your research workspace
Create your free account

Already registered?

By continuing you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy.